Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Tintype Essay

Tintype, or melainotype or ferrotype, photography is a created by making a direct positive on a thin sheet of metal coated with a dark enamel and used as the support for the photographic emulsion. Tintypes were widely used during the 1860s through the 1870s, but is now coming back into the photography scene as a novelty.
The process was first discovered and described by Adolphe-Alexandre Martin (of France) in 1853. It was patented by Hamilton Smith (of the United States) and William Kloen (of the United Kingdom) in 1856. Their success was partly because they were inexpensive, easy, and quick to make. A photographer could prepare, expose, develop, and varnish a tintype for a customer in just a few minutes. Tintype portraits were at first made in a studio, but later became most commonly made by photographers working in booths at places like carnivals and fairs.
There are two types of tintype photography processes: wet and dry. In a wet process (which preceded the dry process), a collodion emulsion containing suspended silver halide crystals had to be formed on the plate right before it was exposed in the camera while still wet. Chemical treatment then reduced the crystals to tiny particles of metallic silver, resulting in a visible image. The dry process, which was more convenient, was similar but used a gelatin emulsion (instead of collodion) which could be applied to the plate before use and exposed in the camera dry. Both processes result in a very underexposed negative image. The most dense areas (lightest parts of the subject) appeared gray by reflected light. The areas with the least amount of silver (darkest areas of the subject) were basically transparent and appeared black. The image as a whole then appeared to be a dull-toned positive. This ability allowed shorter exposure times to be used, which became a great advantage in portraiture. To obtain as light-toned an image as possible, potassium cyanide (a very dangerous and deadly poison) was used as the photographic fixer. Each tintype is usually a camera original, so the image is usually a mirror image, reversed left to right from reality (although sometimes the camera could be fitted with a mirror or right angle prism so the end result would be right reading).
I picked this image because it's very clear and focused, and the freckles on the girl look cool.

I picked this image because the background really makes the subject pop. 

I picked this image because I love the contrast of the black hair on her pale face.

I picked this image because it's the typical type of photo that pops into your head when you think "tintype" 

I picked this image for the same reason as the 2nd photo, because the dark background makes the man's features stand out.

I picked this image because I like the posing of the couple, and how you can see their entire bodies. 

I chose this image because I like her posing and expression. It makes for a really captivating image.

I picked this image because it's a really nice portrait, and I like how the aperture was so low that her nose is out of focus.  

I chose this image because I like how his posing and expression tell a story. 

I picked this image because I like the contrast of her dark hair and shirt against her light skin and the light(ish) background.

Ideally, I want my tintype to be a portrait, preferably somebody with freckles (because that looks really cool with this process). I'll probably use my friend Vivien, wearing a black, vintage shirt (because it will help make her face pop)

Documentary Portraiture

Magazine: Better Homes and Gardens
Spread about Avery, a professional gardener and lover of nature who shares her secrets on keeping her backyard beautiful












Cover Options: 
(totally forgot these were supposed to be shot in the studio........oops) 






Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Website Reviews

None of the website links will work because the school wifi blocked almost all of them!! Yay!

  1. Vic Bonvicini
    1. Based in Nashville, TN
    2. www.vicbonviciniphotography.com
    3. I like the layout of her site (easy to navigate), she uses the same color pallette so it’s pleasing to the eye, and her information and prices are easily accessible. The only thing I don’t like is the font, because it’s very tiny and kind of hard to read.
    4. 6 dropdowns (one is the homepage)
    5. Like wayyyy too many to count
  2. Jaegen Tan
    1. Based in Singapore
    2. www.Jaegentan.com
    3. I like how much information he has about himself and I like the number of photos he has in his portfolio. His website is kind of hard to navigate (especially on mobile) and most of his work is uncaptioned and so the context is unknown
    4. 3 dropdowns + about page and filmography page
    5. About a hundred or so
  3. Luke Gottlieb
    1. Based in Denver, Colorado and LA
    2. www.Victorofvalencia.com
    3. I like the color pallette (the black background looks professional and clean), his portfolio is diverse and showcases all of his work, and his information and history is thorough.  There’s nothing I don’t like.
    4. 4 dropdowns + an about page and a connect page
    5. Less than 100
  4. Paarsa Hajari
    1. Based in LA
    2. www.Paarsahajari.com
    3. I like how the website is easily navigable (for viewing pictures) and is very basic/clean. However, the layout of the website is kind of funky so it’s hard to find information and he doesn’t have very many photos in his portfolio.
    4. 2 dropdown tabs for his portfolio, 4 dropdown tabs for his “gallery” of documentary portraits and whatnot, and an about tab and contact tab.
    5. Less than 50
  5. Alina Schessler
    1. Based in Dormund, Germany
    2. www.Alinaschessler.com
    3. I like how the first thing you see when you open her website is a lot of photos. I don’t like how basic the website is and there isn’t any information about her (just an email and phone #)
    4. 2 tabs-work and about
    5. I really have no idea
  6. Christopher James
    1. Travelling (not based anywhere)
    2. www.Christopherjames.co
    3. I like how the webpage is almost like a story-when you open and scroll down it progressively tells you more information about him and what he does, and there are tabs at the bottom to go to his gallery or his contact information. There isn’t anything I don’t like
    4. 3 tabs/dropdowns
    5. 50 ish
  7. Hunter Gillman
    1. Based in Portland, Oregon
    2. www.Huntergillman.com
    3. I like how detailed and thorough his information is (and it’s easy to find), but I don’t like how he doesn’t have that many photos posted in his portfolio
    4. 9 tabs including a welcome/home page
    5. Less than 50
  8. Chloe Hibbert
    1. Based in Alberta
    2. www.chloehibbert.com
    3. I like the layout of her website and how her portfolio is very diverse and showcases all of her different types of work. I don’t like how she hardly has any photos posted (a lot are on her instagram though)
    4. 6 tabs/dropdowns including a home page
    5. Less than 20  
  9. Aakaash B
    1. Based in Long Island, NY
    2. www.Aakaashbphoto.com
    3. I like how his website is very easy to navigate and he has everything very organized, but I don’t like the layout of the website (can’t explain why-feels like early 2000s for some reason)
    4. 6 dropdowns
    5. More than 100
  10. Lauren Elizabeth Parr
    1. Based in Austin, Texas
    2. www.Laurenelizabethparr.com
    3. I like how many photos she has posted, and her information is easy to find (the webpage is very navigable in general). There’s nothing I don’t like.
    4. 5 dropdowns and a homepage tab
    5. More than 100

Reflectors

NATURAL LIGHT





ARTIFICIAL LIGHT






Portrait Review